Enlaces News (January 2004)
Charting a New Course on Immigrants and Immigration Policy: Key Elements
for Comprehensive and Lasting Policy Changes—A Heartland Alliance
Perspective
As talk grows on the prospect of U.S. policy changes on immigrants
and immigration policy, we have an unprecedented opportunity to develop
a coordinated set of principles that would form the basis of a forward-looking,
smart, and durable policy framework for migration.
Such a framework would depart from recognizing that immigrants form
a vital part of the economic well being of the U.S., as well as being
an invaluable asset to bring true economic opportunity and prosperity
to their countries of origin. It would contain clear paths to permanent
legal status, and would address current shortcomings in administrative
procedures. Truly visionary migration policies would also take into
account the international nature of migration. It is a phenomenon that
can and must be managed in a way that responds to the needs and interests
of both sending and receiving countries if we are to come to lasting
solutions.
The following policy changes are offered as key elements for a new
migration policy framework:
1. Legalize all undocumented immigrant workers and their family members
who are now residing in the U.S. without immigration status. A new category
for temporary legal immigration status would immediately allow beneficiaries
the following:
a. To legally work in the U.S. Persons with this status would be issued
a social security number and employment authorization.
b. Eligibility to basic social, economic, and political rights in the
U.S. (using pre-1996 criteria).
c. To travel back and forth, legally, to their countries of origin.
All beneficiaries would have to meet basic health and security screening
criteria. After a reasonable period of time (perhaps five years) under
this status, and proven that a given beneficiary has maintained steady
employment and good moral character; beneficiaries would be able to
apply for legal permanent residence based on application requirements
in place before the enactment of the 1996 Immigration Act. There must
be no interruption of status from one to the other.
2. Revamp, from the bottom up, the current immigration services system;
beginning with a prompt (twelve month) processing of all pending legal
permanent residency applications. Extraordinary resources should be
allocated to this critical task. Once backlogs are brought up to date,
all immigration benefit applications should be finalized within six
months. The unification of immigrant families, as well as our commitment
to being a leader in humanitarian protection should be cornerstones
of our immigration policy. This measure would ensure the permanent elimination
of backlogs and the elimination of one of the chief reason for visitors’
visa overstays, as well as unauthorized entries.
3. Articulate a brand new immigrant integration policy intended to
fast-track new immigrants’ social, economic, and political integration
into U.S. society. It is not sufficient to provide legal status for
immigrants. We must concern ourselves with providing opportunities for
healthy integration into democratic, economic, and social processes
in the U.S. To this end, a national immigrant integration summit should
be organized, involving every state government, every federal government
entity involved in any way with immigrant populations, as well as nonprofit
organizations at the local and national levels. The goal of this summit
would be to identify the chief premises of an innovative immigrant integration
policy that would allow local, state, and federal governments to effectively
cooperate and collaborate on how best to support the social, political,
and economic integration of immigrant communities into U.S. society.
4. Articulate an international policy to wisely and humanely manage
future migration flows. No one-time policy change (such as an amnesty)
will solve migration problems over the long term. We must recognize
that migration occurs in a regional and global economic context. A hemispheric
migration summit should be organized with the purpose of articulating
a realistic and economically smart policy to manage migration flows
in the Western Hemisphere in a way that is also humane and of mutual
convenience to sending and receiving countries. As a hemispheric-wide
approach takes root, and lessons are learned, a similar global conference
should also be held. The purpose of these summits would be to devise
a multilateral policy to manage hemispheric and global migration flows
in ways that respond to the labor force needs of the U.S. and other
developed countries, as well as to migration pressures in developing
countries. A multilaterally managed temporary worker program, with a
clear option toward permanent settlement in the U.S., could be a way
of putting this policy into effect.
5. Immediately introduce key economic policy reforms aimed at creating
broad economic opportunity for people in developing countries. A newly
appointed international economic policy task force should be created.
Such a task force should design a new paradigm for economic integration
and development in the Western Hemisphere and the rest of the developing
world. The goal of the economic policy reform would be to arrive, within
a reasonable but brief period of time, at a set of policies that will
promote broad social and economic opportunity that would permit residents
of developing countries to pursue their aspirations without leaving
their home countries. Without this component, any immigration relief
in the U.S. for undocumented immigrant populations will be short lived.
In tandem with the economic policy reform, U.S. assistance to Latin
America and the Caribbean should be significantly increased and redesigned
to support sustainable and equitable development. Given the fact that
remittances sent by immigrants in the U.S. from Latin America and the
Caribbean have become the chief source of foreign revenue to their respective
national economies, it is imperative to include organized expressions
of immigrant communities in both the economic policy reform task force
and the re-design of foreign assistance. The task force should also
involve government and civil society actors from Latin America and the
Caribbean. Significantly improved standards of life by the majority
of the citizens throughout the Western hemisphere will become the best
antidote to migration pressures throughout this region.
All these tasks are viable if we have the will to carry them out. This
policy shift would allow us a better, more humane approach on how to
deal with migration as a key element in the ever more interdependent
hemispheric and global economic system in which we live today. A policy
and practice shift of this magnitude would also require drastic changes
in the way resources are being allocated now at all levels of government
in relationship to immigrants.