Enlaces News (January 2004)
Central American Immigrant Leaders Reconvene in Washington DC
Over 40 Central Americans representing communities and cities from
Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, North
Carolina, Texas, New Jersey, Nevada, Rhode Island and Virginia, came
together in Washington D.C. on October 16, 2003 marking the 2nd Encuentro
(encounter) of Central American leaders since the group first convened
in Ledbetter, Texas, in February of 2003. The group of prominent Central
American community leaders and activists reunited to discuss a range
of issues dealing with presidential elections in their countries of
origin, to the proposed Central American free trade agreement, and U.S.
immigration reform.
After a day of legislative visits, participants heard from a distinguished
panel of speakers that included Joanna Carson, of AILA (American Immigration
Lawyer’s Association.), Rick Swartz, an Independent consultant
on Immigration Policy, and Josh Bernstein, Legislative Director of the
National Immigration Law Center who updated the group on the current
climate on Capitol Hill surrounding immigration reform. The panelists
covered a an array of topics from the political success of the Immigrant
Freedom Ride, to the Ag-Jobs bill and the Dream Act, as well as the
Flake-McCain Bill, all of which were at various stages of debate in
the House and Senate. Panelist concurred that none of these represents
an ideal model for reform, but expressed hope that some progress could
be made in the relatively near future. Panelists pointed out that many
legislators do not understand the complexity of immigration reform,
but there is growing evidence that legislatures were becoming more aware
of its importance in appealing to Latino voters and in securing the
nation’s borders.
With the impending completion of the negotiations for a U.S.-Central
America Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA) , participants were particularly
eager to discuss its potential impacts on their countries of origin.
Amy Shannon, Enlaces America Associate Director outlined the potential
advantages and disadvantages of CAFTA for both the U.S. and Central
American economies. Dr. Bernardo Villela, the president of ConGuate
(the National Guatemalan Congress) advocated for a moratorium on the
negotiations in large part because of the problematic nature of the
closed and secret negotiation process, as well as the lack of consultation
with civic society sectors. Moreover, Dr. Villela also referred to the
significant negative impact NAFTA has had on Mexico’s rural and
urban populations, over the last ten years. Both panelists expressed
serious concerns about CAFTA’s potential impact on Central American
communities and suggested that continued and increasing migration could
be expected. After reviewing the accords made in their previous encounter
in Ledbetter, participants broke into small groups to redefine common
goals that could delineate points of collaborative action for the coming
years. Focusing on public and economic policies in the U.S. and in their
countries of origin, they outlined the common objectives highlighted
below.
Common Objectives
· To advance in assuring new means of migratory protection
putting emphasis on permanent legal status for migrant populations,
particularly Central Americans.
· To increase access to all levels of education for Central
American immigrants .
· To improve dissemination and coverage, of topics of interest
to our communities in important media outlets.
· To have formulated a model for civic participation that seeks
improvements in the quality of life of Central American communities.
· To develop a Central American movement that recognizes diversity
and is capable of working toward common objectives.
· To contribute to the defense of human and civil rights for
all immigrants.
· To form an organized and focused majority movement capable
of formulating and implementing public policies in our countries of
origin.
· To build understanding and a sense of responsibility
among Central Americans and encourage them to support these
objectives through their diverse means and resources.
The 2nd Central American Leaders’ Encounter reaffirmed the participants’
commitment to develop common strategies that could consolidate their
political power into a national force for change and improvement in
Central American communities here in the U.S., and in their countries
of origin.